IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Wohlberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-07-18 Country: USA
2008 · Round 6, Pick #172  ·  New Jersey Devils New Jersey Devils
Signed Professionally
Tigers Bayreuth · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 USNTDP Juniors NAHL 45 10 10 20 0.444 0.1633 0.1855 0.4691 0.5329
2007-08 — NTDP-U18 37 9 7 16 0.432 0.3214 0.3179 1.6135 1.5961
2016-17 Tigers Bayreuth DEL2 50 20 21 41 0.820 1.0985 1.2154 1.4714 1.6280
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Michigan D1 CCHA-orig SR 41 16 17 33 0.805
2010-11 Michigan D1 CCHA-orig JR 37 15 6 21 0.568
2009-10 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 44 10 17 27 0.614
2008-09 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 40 15 15 30 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2008-09 · Michigan
+230.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13581
Forward overall
#544
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2011-12
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.