Drew Shore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-29 Country: USA

2009 · Round 2, Pick #44 ·

Florida Panthers

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2007-08	U.S. National U17 Team	NTDP-U18	16	4	8	12	0.750	0.5575	0.5664	2.7985	2.8430
2008-09	U.S. National U18 Team	NTDP-U18	47	10	25	35	0.745	0.5535	0.5326	2.7788	2.6738
2018-19	Shanghai Dragons	KHL	18	6	5	11	0.611	1.5277	1.4975	8.4202	8.2539
2019-20	—	KHL	43	4	23	27	0.628	1.5697	1.5697	8.6516	8.6516

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2011-12	Denver	D1	WCHA-orig	JR	42	22	31	53	1.262
2010-11	Denver	D1	WCHA-orig	SO	40	23	23	46	1.150
2009-10	Denver	D1	NCHC	FR	41	5	14	19	0.463

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.51

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.46

2009-10 · Denver

-8.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 19 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#707

Forward overall

#35

Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.