IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kenny Agostino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-30 Country: USA
2010 · Round 5, Pick #140  ·  Pittsburgh Penguins Pittsburgh Penguins
Signed Professionally
ERC Ingolstadt · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 46 20 20 40 0.870 2.1740 1.9100 11.9820 10.5267
2022-23 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 29 4 7 11 0.379 0.9483 0.7571 5.2263 4.1723
2023-24 Düsseldorfer EG DEL 48 14 34 48 1.000 2.5000 2.1290 8.4782 7.2200
2024-25 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 50 12 33 45 0.900 2.2500 1.8127 7.6304 6.1475
2025-26 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 50 19 27 46 0.920 2.3000 1.9608 7.7999 6.6495
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Yale D1 ECAC SR 33 14 18 32 0.970
2012-13 Yale D1 ECAC JR 37 17 24 41 1.108
2011-12 Yale D1 ECAC SO 33 14 20 34 1.030
2010-11 Yale D1 ECAC FR 31 11 14 25 0.806

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 38 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1457
Forward overall
#90
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.