Tanner Kero Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-07-24 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2009-10	Marquette Rangers	NAHL	57	32	19	51	0.895	0.3545	0.3892	0.9393	1.0314
2010-11	Fargo Force	USHL	55	14	23	37	0.673	0.4135	0.4171	1.9819	1.9992
2024-25	HV71	SHL	52	9	13	22	0.423	1.0577	0.7588	—	—
2025-26	Kölner Haie	DEL	41	11	18	29	0.707	0.7735	0.6684	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2014-15	Michigan Tech	D1	WCHA	SR	41	20	26	46	1.122
2013-14	Michigan Tech	D1	WCHA	JR	40	15	10	25	0.625
2012-13	Michigan	D1	CCHA-orig	—	33	11	13	24	0.727
2012-13	Michigan Tech	D1	—	SO	33	11	13	24	0.727
2011-12	Michigan	D1	CCHA-orig	—	39	9	7	16	0.410
2011-12	Michigan Tech	D1	—	FR	39	9	7	16	0.410

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.35

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.41

2011-12 · Michigan

+18.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

82%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2410

Forward overall

#136

Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Logan DiScanio

New England · 2017-18

1.000 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Justin Fox

Salem State · 2005-06

1.429 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brycon Johnson

Bryn Athyn · 2014-15

0.778 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.