← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Marshall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-08-30 Country: USA
2010 · Round 7, Pick #201  ·  Detroit Red Wings Detroit Red Wings
Signed Professionally
Schwenninger Wild Wings · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Omaha Lancers USHL 56 11 21 32 0.571 0.3371 0.3418 1.7161 1.7399
2019-20 Dinamo Riga KHL 56 2 10 12 0.214 0.5357 0.5357 2.9528 2.9528
2020-21 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 36 2 13 15 0.417 1.0417 1.0417 3.5329 3.5329
2021-22 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 44 6 21 27 0.614 1.5340 1.4558 5.2022 4.9370
2022-23 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 35 3 13 16 0.457 1.1427 1.0509 3.8754 3.5640
2023-24 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 51 6 19 25 0.490 1.2255 1.0641 4.1560 3.6086
2024-25 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 52 3 26 29 0.558 1.3942 1.1465 4.7283 3.8883
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 39 2 9 11 0.282
2013-14 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 39 3 15 18 0.462
2012-13 Minnesota D1 WCHA-orig SO 40 8 11 19 0.475
2011-12 Minnesota D1 WCHA-orig FR 41 4 9 13 0.317
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2011-12 · Minnesota
-1.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#959
Defenseman overall
#236
Defenseman born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.