Joakim Ryan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-06-17 Country: Sweden

2012 · Round 7, Pick #198 ·

San Jose Sharks

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2010-11	Dubuque Fighting Saints	USHL	53	3	29	32	0.604	0.3562	0.3753	1.8135	1.9108
2021-22	Malmö Redhawks	SHL	52	9	22	31	0.596	1.4905	1.3549	7.7796	7.0717
2022-23	Malmö Redhawks	SHL	52	1	14	15	0.288	0.7212	0.6385	3.7645	3.3330
2023-24	Malmö Redhawks	SHL	52	7	11	18	0.346	0.8655	0.7105	4.5174	3.7081

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2014-15	Cornell	D1	ECAC	SR	23	1	13	14	0.609
2013-14	Cornell	D1	ECAC	JR	32	8	16	24	0.750
2012-13	Cornell	D1	ECAC	SO	34	3	20	23	0.676
2011-12	Cornell	D1	ECAC	FR	34	7	10	17	0.500

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.35

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.50

2011-12 · Cornell

+41.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

85%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#267

Defenseman overall

#95

Defenseman born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.