Andy Welinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-04-27 Country: USA

2011 · Round 3, Pick #83 ·

Anaheim Ducks

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2010-11	Green Bay Gamblers	USHL	51	6	8	14	0.275	0.1619	0.1695	0.8244	0.8629
2011-12	Green Bay Gamblers	USHL	54	15	22	37	0.685	0.4042	0.4042	2.0579	2.0579
2024-25	Löwen Frankfurt	DEL	24	1	5	6	0.250	0.6250	0.5345	2.1195	1.8126

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2015-16	Minnesota Duluth	D1	NCHC	SR	40	6	13	19	0.475
2014-15	Minnesota Duluth	D1	NCHC	JR	40	9	12	21	0.525
2013-14	Minnesota Duluth	D1	NCHC	SO	36	5	14	19	0.528
2012-13	Minnesota Duluth	D1	WCHA-orig	FR	38	4	14	18	0.474

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.29

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.47

2012-13 · Minnesota Duluth

+61.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

82%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3300

Defenseman overall

#575

Defenseman born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Coffman

Utica · 2023-24

1.480 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Quinn Waller

Adrian · 2006-07

1.586 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Jonathan Schultz

St. Norbert · 2001-02

1.125 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.