IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Farley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-10 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Luleå HF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Fargo Force USHL 33 7 4 11 0.333 0.1966 0.2111 0.9820 1.0543
2011-12 Fargo Force USHL 51 28 31 59 1.157 0.6825 0.7009 3.4085 3.5004
2017-18 IF Björklöven Allsvenskan 43 15 18 33 0.767 1.9185 2.0556 — —
2018-19 Luleå HF SHL 30 5 7 12 0.400 1.0000 1.0526 — —
2019-20 Luleå HF SHL 22 3 2 5 0.227 0.5683 0.5683 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SR 37 15 16 31 0.838
2014-15 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC JR 40 8 16 24 0.600
2013-14 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC — 31 7 10 17 0.548
2012-13 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-orig — 36 16 18 34 0.944
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.94
2012-13 · Minnesota Duluth
+100.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 15 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1477
Forward overall
#88
Forward born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.