| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 11 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.909 | 0.5588 | 0.5707 | 2.6784 | 2.7356 |
| 2024-25 | Shanghai Dragons | KHL | 20 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.550 | 1.3750 | 1.0135 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | SR | 39 | 20 | 21 | 41 | 1.051 |
| 2013-14 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | JR | 41 | 14 | 26 | 40 | 0.976 |
| 2012-13 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-orig | SO | 40 | 15 | 25 | 40 | 1.000 |
| 2011-12 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-orig | FR | 40 | 18 | 25 | 43 | 1.075 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.