← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Dorantes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Tri-City Storm USHL 44 1 7 8 0.182 0.1072 0.1159 0.5460 0.5901
2011-12 Tri-City Storm USHL 42 5 6 11 0.262 0.1545 0.1598 0.7866 0.8134
2012-13 Powell River Kings BCHL 49 14 19 33 0.673 0.2595 0.2608 0.9801 0.9850
2013-14 Powell River Kings BCHL 53 29 28 57 1.075 0.4144 0.3973 1.5652 1.5007
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 36 5 11 16 0.444
2016-17 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 33 3 12 15 0.455
2015-16 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 39 8 12 20 0.513
2014-15 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 33 3 3 6 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2014-15 · Ferris State
-38.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16230
Forward overall
#662
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.