IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Wade Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Fargo Force USHL 35 0 1 1 0.029 0.0169 0.0185 0.0859 0.0940
2011-12 Fargo Force USHL 57 2 5 7 0.123 0.0724 0.0759 0.3688 0.3865
2012-13 — USHL 60 3 7 10 0.167 0.0983 0.0978 0.5007 0.4981
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 36 0 3 3 0.083
2015-16 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 34 1 6 7 0.206
2014-15 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 41 1 6 7 0.171
2013-14 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#21437
Defenseman overall
#2214
Defenseman born in 1994
#4031
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor van Weelie
Concordia · 2021-22
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Hersant
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Seaverson
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.452 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.