IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phil Boje Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 42 1 3 4 0.095 0.0606 0.0603 0.2853 0.2838
2013-14 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 56 9 3 12 0.214 0.1365 0.1294 0.6422 0.6088
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Air Force D1 AHA SR 39 2 15 17 0.436
2016-17 Air Force D1 AHA JR 42 9 21 30 0.714
2015-16 Air Force D1 AHA SO 36 4 11 15 0.417
2014-15 Air Force D1 AHA FR 28 7 2 9 0.321
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2014-15 · Air Force
+234.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11594
Defenseman overall
#1515
Defenseman born in 1994
#3888
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Nick
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2011-12
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Vassallo
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Don Olivieri
Utica · 2010-11
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.