IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Hersant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-21 Country: U.K.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Express Hockey Club EHL 44 11 26 37 0.841 0.1230 0.1283 0.4123 0.4302
2019-20 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 53 8 13 21 0.396 0.0763 0.0763 0.2497 0.2497
2020-21 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 16 1 2 3 0.188 0.0722 0.0722 0.2732 0.2732
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 King's D3 MAC — 25 15 15 30 1.200
2023-24 King's D3 MAC — 26 15 12 27 1.038
2022-23 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 11 2 0 2 0.182
2021-22 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 27 4 12 16 0.593
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2021-22 · St. Olaf
+439.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39790
Forward overall
#2161
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Salzillo
St. Michael's College · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braeden Holcomb
St. Scholastica · 2019-20
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Sawicky
Bethel · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.