IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braeden Holcomb Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 27 8 21 29 1.074 0.2891 0.2891 0.2609 0.2609
2020-21 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 17 8 11 19 1.118 0.3009 0.3009 0.2715 0.2715
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 10 0 3 3 0.300
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 21 1 4 5 0.238
2021-22 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 15 1 5 6 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2021-22 · St. Scholastica
+57.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16086
Forward overall
#851
Forward born in 2002
#655
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Girduckis
Chatham · 2016-17
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Horacek
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fleck
Augsburg · 2001-02
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.