IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Fitzgerald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-10-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0969 0.0919 0.4652 0.4412
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Curry D3 — SR 16 3 6 9 0.562
2016-17 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 34 12 19 31 0.912
2016-17 Curry D3 — JR 22 2 4 6 0.273
2015-16 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 40 24 23 47 1.175
2015-16 Curry D3 — SO 11 1 4 5 0.455
2014-15 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 38 17 8 25 0.658
2014-15 Curry D3 — FR 22 4 8 12 0.545
2013-14 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 40 13 16 29 0.725
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2013-14 · Boston College
+821.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David McNab
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Brandt
Tufts · 2016-17
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Sawicky
Bethel · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.