IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cédric Lacroix Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kemptville 73's CCHL 61 2 15 17 0.279 0.0795 0.0862 0.2157 0.2338
2012-13 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 53 6 1 7 0.132 0.0841 0.0860 0.3959 0.4049
2013-14 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 54 8 11 19 0.352 0.2241 0.2187 1.0545 1.0292
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 34 6 5 11 0.324
2016-17 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 35 5 5 10 0.286
2015-16 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 37 5 3 8 0.216
2014-15 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 39 5 6 11 0.282
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2014-15 · Maine
+98.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28256
Forward overall
#1150
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Master
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buster Larsson
Utica · 2017-18
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Headland
Canton · 2017-18
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.