← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cédric Lacroix Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-03 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Västerviks IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kemptville 73's CCHL 61 2 15 17 0.279 0.0605 0.0656 0.2156 0.2337
2012-13 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 53 6 1 7 0.132 0.0779 0.0797 0.3967 0.4057
2013-14 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 54 8 11 19 0.352 0.2076 0.2026 1.0569 1.0315
2023-24 Västerviks IK Allsvenskan 28 4 5 9 0.321 0.8035 0.6687 3.0153 2.5093
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 34 6 5 11 0.324
2016-17 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 35 5 5 10 0.286
2015-16 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 37 5 3 8 0.216
2014-15 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 39 5 6 11 0.282
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2014-15 · Maine
+114.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7188
Forward overall
#347
Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.