← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryan Basilico Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.1025 0.1115 0.4911 0.5341
2012-13 USHL 15 0 1 1 0.067 0.0410 0.0424 0.1965 0.2033
2013-14 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 48 16 16 32 0.667 0.2483 0.2514 0.9714 0.9833
2014-15 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 51 12 22 34 0.667 0.2483 0.2398 0.9714 0.9381
2015-16 BCHL 52 15 20 35 0.673 0.2507 0.2287 0.9808 0.8946
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SR 39 2 2 4 0.103
2018-19 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA JR 37 5 3 8 0.216
2017-18 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 30 1 3 4 0.133
2016-17 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 11 2 1 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2016-17 · Lake Superior State
+36.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21207
Forward overall
#792
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.