IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Gaudreau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-12-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Omaha Lancers USHL 52 8 14 22 0.423 0.2601 0.2810 1.2465 1.3467
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 54 7 11 18 0.333 0.2049 0.2105 0.9820 1.0087
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 40 8 27 35 0.875
2015-16 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 39 4 17 21 0.538
2014-15 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 32 3 3 6 0.188
2013-14 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2013-14 · Boston College
-38.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24119
Forward overall
#941
Forward born in 1994
#2385
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Jackson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Wiesner
Babson · 2015-16
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.