IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Girduckis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-10-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Wellington Dukes OJHL 47 1 6 7 0.149 0.0365 0.0393 0.1025 0.1104
2016-17 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 56 11 15 26 0.464 0.1007 0.1047 0.3592 0.3734
2017-18 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 51 7 24 31 0.608 0.1318 0.1302 0.4703 0.4646
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 19 1 4 5 0.263
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 23 0 8 8 0.348
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 23 2 10 12 0.522
2020-21 Chatham D1 UCHC SO 12 2 5 7 0.583
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 12 2 5 7 0.583
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 22 1 0 1 0.045
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2018-19 · Robert Morris
-59.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11266
Defenseman overall
#1939
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Leonard
Western New England · 2001-02
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Ferrell
SUNY Potsdam · 2015-16
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Geiger
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.