IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Ferrell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 50 18 14 32 0.640 0.1923 0.1874 0.4381 0.4269
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Potsdam D1 — SR 25 10 8 18 0.720
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SR 25 10 8 18 0.720
2018-19 Potsdam D1 — JR 24 9 12 21 0.875
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 — JR 24 9 12 21 0.875
2017-18 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SO 14 0 4 4 0.286
2016-17 SUNY Potsdam D3 — FR 22 8 8 16 0.727
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2016-17 · SUNY Potsdam
+353.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29399
Forward overall
#1220
Forward born in 1996
#1888
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Nichol
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Jensen
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Klin
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.