← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Bayda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-09-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 52 5 9 14 0.269 0.0690 0.0726 0.2029 0.2134
2001-02 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 64 27 32 59 0.922 0.2362 0.2370 0.6949 0.6974
2002-03 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 61 27 51 78 1.279 0.3276 0.3111 0.9639 0.9154
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 26 2 9 11 0.423
2005-06 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 6 1 1 2 0.333
2004-05 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 24 2 7 9 0.375
2003-04 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 15 1 6 7 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2003-04 · St. Norbert
+93.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17525
Forward overall
#544
Forward born in 1982
#176
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.