IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Jensen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-09-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 — USHL 52 5 17 22 0.423 0.2601 0.2682 1.2465 1.2854
2009-10 — USHL 53 6 21 27 0.509 0.3131 0.3028 1.5008 1.4517
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 16 2 9 11 0.688
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 26 6 9 15 0.577
2012-13 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-orig JR 41 4 27 31 0.756
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 27 10 10 20 0.741
2011-12 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-orig SO 39 6 26 32 0.821
2010-11 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 26 8 14 22 0.846
2010-11 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-orig FR 38 5 18 23 0.605
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2010-11 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+210.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3260
Defenseman overall
#657
Defenseman born in 1990
#1659
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michel Bond
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Cassells
Elmira · 2000-01
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.