IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Panvica Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Mason City Toros NA3HL 40 26 36 62 1.550 0.1945 0.1922 — —
2015-16 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 58 4 22 26 0.448 0.1647 0.1568 0.4732 0.4504
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 28 9 11 20 0.714
2018-19 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 26 5 19 24 0.923
2017-18 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 26 14 16 30 1.154
2016-17 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 22 10 11 21 0.955
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.95
2016-17 · St. Thomas
+552.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21082
Forward overall
#785
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Lavery
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bobby Hineman
Adrian · 2006-07
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Doden
Augsburg · 2007-08
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.