IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Doden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-08-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 56 12 7 19 0.339 0.1247 0.1234 0.3581 0.3543
2007-08 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 42 7 12 19 0.452 0.1662 0.1563 0.4775 0.4490
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 25 14 8 22 0.880
2010-11 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 26 7 8 15 0.577
2009-10 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 26 6 4 10 0.385
2008-09 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 24 10 14 24 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2008-09 · Augsburg
+716.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34500
Forward overall
#1111
Forward born in 1987
#3397
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luca Esposito
SUNY Cortland · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Wright
Bowdoin · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Walker Hamilton
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.