IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Doden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-08-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 56 12 7 19 0.339 0.1260 0.1247 0.3593 0.3555
2007-08 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 42 7 12 19 0.452 0.1680 0.1580 0.4790 0.4504
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 25 14 8 22 0.880
2010-11 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 26 7 8 15 0.577
2009-10 Augsburg D3 — SO 26 6 4 10 0.385
2008-09 Augsburg D3 — FR 24 10 14 24 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2008-09 · Augsburg
+707.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27559
Forward overall
#1060
Forward born in 1987
#3181
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Lavery
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bobby Hineman
Adrian · 2006-07
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Garrison
Johnson & Wales · 2018-19
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.