IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Wright Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 36 12 11 23 0.639 0.0770 0.0770 0.2018 0.2018
2021-22 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 43 19 29 48 1.116 0.1345 0.1266 0.3529 0.3381
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 24 5 10 15 0.625
2024-25 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 15 1 2 3 0.200
2023-24 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 13 2 3 5 0.385
2022-23 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35618
Forward overall
#1531
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt McQuade
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Schmidbauer
Salve Regina · 2013-14
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Reif
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.