IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Tyrrell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Markham Royals OJHL 31 3 2 5 0.161 0.0485 0.0502 0.1104 0.1142
2022-23 — OJHL 42 7 14 21 0.500 0.1502 0.1476 0.3422 0.3364
2023-24 — OJHL 54 28 30 58 1.074 0.3227 0.3004 0.7352 0.6845
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 30 4 17 21 0.700
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 16 2 3 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Stout
+52.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27299
Forward overall
#1560
Forward born in 2003
#1675
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Henderson
Western New England · 2010-11
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Routledge
Canton · 2017-18
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Geric Brodt
Wentworth · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.