← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt McQuade Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 CCHL 27 2 1 3 0.111 0.0317 0.0345 0.0860 0.0935
2019-20 Nepean Raiders CCHL 60 19 34 53 0.883 0.2521 0.2521 0.6838 0.6838
2020-21 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 39 6 5 11 0.282 0.1047 0.1047 0.2987 0.2987
2021-22 NAHL 61 19 21 40 0.656 0.2435 0.2335 0.6943 0.6658
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 28 12 13 25 0.893
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 26 15 14 29 1.115
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 23 6 5 11 0.478
2022-23 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 27 5 9 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2022-23 · SUNY Oswego
+293.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
50%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20086
Forward overall
#699
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2004-05
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.