← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt McQuade Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 CCHL 27 2 1 3 0.111 0.0241 0.0262 0.0860 0.0935
2019-20 Nepean Raiders CCHL 60 19 34 53 0.883 0.1916 0.1916 0.6834 0.6834
2020-21 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 39 6 5 11 0.282 0.1036 0.1036 0.2978 0.2978
2021-22 NAHL 61 19 21 40 0.656 0.2409 0.2310 0.6921 0.6637
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 28 12 13 25 0.893
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 26 15 14 29 1.115
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 23 6 5 11 0.478
2022-23 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 27 5 9 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2022-23 · SUNY Oswego
+306.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25410
Forward overall
#1283
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2004-05
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.