← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Schmidbauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-09-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 49 9 8 17 0.347 0.1275 0.1407 0.3662 0.4041
2011-12 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 51 1 8 9 0.176 0.0648 0.0683 0.1863 0.1964
2012-13 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 53 14 8 22 0.415 0.1525 0.1531 0.4381 0.4398
2013-14 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 57 17 20 37 0.649 0.2385 0.2275 0.6851 0.6534
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Salve Regina D1 CNE SR 27 7 8 15 0.556
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE GR 27 7 8 15 0.556
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 2 1 0 1 0.500
2016-17 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 22 7 8 15 0.682
2015-16 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 27 5 15 20 0.741
2014-15 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 25 8 5 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2014-15 · Salve Regina
+207.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30247
Forward overall
#1041
Forward born in 1993
#2735
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2005-06
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2003-04
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.