← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Schmidbauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-09-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 49 9 8 17 0.347 0.1288 0.1421 0.3673 0.4053
2011-12 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 51 1 8 9 0.176 0.0655 0.0690 0.1869 0.1970
2012-13 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 53 14 8 22 0.415 0.1541 0.1547 0.4395 0.4412
2013-14 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 57 17 20 37 0.649 0.2410 0.2299 0.6873 0.6555
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE GR 27 7 8 15 0.556
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 2 1 0 1 0.500
2016-17 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 22 7 8 15 0.682
2015-16 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 27 5 15 20 0.741
2014-15 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 25 8 5 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2014-15 · Salve Regina
+204.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23869
Forward overall
#913
Forward born in 1993
#2521
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2005-06
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2003-04
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.