IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Fleck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-10-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2001-02 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 41 10 9 19 0.463 0.1548 0.1612 0.4302 0.4481
2002-03 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 58 12 13 25 0.431 0.1440 0.1432 0.4001 0.3980
2003-04 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 58 18 20 38 0.655 0.1893 0.1811 0.4932 0.4718
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Augsburg D3 — FR 24 7 7 14 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2004-05 · Augsburg
+310.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24855
Forward overall
#816
Forward born in 1983

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Klin
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave Lewandowski
Wentworth · 2004-05
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Grant Newcomer
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.