← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Newcomer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 41 31 37 68 1.659 0.2232 0.2232 0.5646 0.5646
2021-22 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 41 20 26 46 1.122 0.1510 0.1443 0.3819 0.3650
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 22 0 5 5 0.227
2025-26 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SR 21 0 5 5 0.238
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 18 0 3 3 0.167
2024-25 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA JR 18 0 3 3 0.167
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 25 4 6 10 0.400
2023-24 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SO 25 4 6 10 0.400
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 27 5 9 14 0.518
2022-23 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 26 4 7 11 0.423
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2022-23 · Concordia
+319.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22780
Forward overall
#831
Forward born in 2001
#325
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2008-09
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.