IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-10-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Estevan Bruins SJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 58 22 19 41 0.707 0.2042 0.2169 0.5322 0.5653
2011-12 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 57 13 24 37 0.649 0.1875 0.1890 0.4886 0.4925
2012-13 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 54 19 24 43 0.796 0.2301 0.2217 0.5995 0.5775
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 28 6 8 14 0.500
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 27 5 9 14 0.518
2014-15 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 22 3 7 10 0.455
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 26 5 7 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2013-14 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+158.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18862
Forward overall
#814
Forward born in 1992
#477
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Harguindeguy
Concordia · 2021-22
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Wood
Endicott · 2014-15
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Primo Self
Endicott · 2021-22
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.