IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryder Many Grey Horses Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 49 10 13 23 0.469 0.1574 0.1647 0.4350 0.4552
2023-24 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 48 10 20 30 0.625 0.2096 0.2094 0.5792 0.5788
2024-25 — NAHL 60 15 20 35 0.583 0.2072 0.2006 0.6124 0.5930
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA — 32 6 14 20 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2025-26 · Aurora
+257.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27111
Forward overall
#1565
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Dollimer
Augsburg · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Baldillez
Norwich · 2013-14
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.