← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Dollimer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-11-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rosemount High USHS-MN 25 12 20 32 1.280 0.1620 0.1592 0.3109 0.3056
2016-17 Minot Minotauros NAHL 54 9 13 22 0.407 0.1497 0.1512 0.4300 0.4344
2017-18 Minot Minotauros NAHL 57 11 34 45 0.789 0.2901 0.2787 0.8333 0.8006
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC GR 28 12 19 31 1.107
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 30 10 22 32 1.067
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Augsburg D1 MIAC SO 26 1 13 14 0.538
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 26 1 13 14 0.538
2018-19 Augsburg D1 MIAC FR 28 8 13 21 0.750
2018-19 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 28 8 13 21 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2018-19 · Augsburg
+284.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18580
Forward overall
#827
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2007-08
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.