| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Rosemount High | USHS-MN | 25 | 12 | 20 | 32 | 1.280 | 0.3446 | 0.3387 | 0.3109 | 0.3056 |
| 2016-17 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 54 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 0.407 | 0.1513 | 0.1528 | 0.4314 | 0.4358 |
| 2017-18 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 57 | 11 | 34 | 45 | 0.789 | 0.2931 | 0.2816 | 0.8359 | 0.8031 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | GR | 28 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 1.107 |
| 2021-22 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | SR | 30 | 10 | 22 | 32 | 1.067 |
| 2020-21 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | JR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | SO | 26 | 1 | 13 | 14 | 0.538 |
| 2018-19 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | FR | 28 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 0.750 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.