IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Troutwine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-09-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Proctor USHS-MN 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Eveleth-Gilbert USHS-MN 17 1 16 17 1.000 0.1266 0.1266 — —
2021-22 Rock Ridge USHS-MN 25 14 9 23 0.920 0.1165 0.1165 0.2235 0.2235
2022-23 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 33 0 2 2 0.061 0.0223 0.0226 0.0640 0.0648
2023-24 — NAHL 55 2 10 12 0.218 0.0802 0.0774 0.2303 0.2222
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 18 0 11 11 0.611
2024-25 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 7 1 2 3 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2024-25 · Skidmore
+717.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16487
Defenseman overall
#3001
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Cooley
Johnson & Wales · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
James Hope
Post · 2024-25
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kam Hellman
New England College · 2021-22
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.