IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keaton Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-14 Country: USA
2013 · Round 3, Pick #87  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
Signed Professionally
Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Fargo Force USHL 13 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 54 5 17 22 0.407 0.3028 0.3167 1.5202 1.5900
2012-13 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 67 4 18 22 0.328 0.2441 0.2425 1.2254 1.2176
2023-24 Adler Mannheim DEL 6 1 2 3 0.500 1.2500 1.2753 4.2391 4.3249
2024-25 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 56 2 9 11 0.196 0.4910 0.4328 2.7061 2.3853
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 43 2 15 17 0.395
2014-15 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 36 3 8 11 0.306
2013-14 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 26 3 5 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2013-14 · North Dakota
+19.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2527
Defenseman overall
#511
Defenseman born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Yuel
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Kalinowski
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Ford
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.