← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Bailey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-10-27 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
ERC Ingolstadt · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 51 13 11 24 0.471 0.1813 0.1895 0.6844 0.7152
2010-11 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 60 28 30 58 0.967 0.3725 0.3718 1.4060 1.4033
2011-12 Omaha Lancers USHL 60 27 32 59 0.983 0.5800 0.5365 2.9506 2.7292
2018-19 HC Slovan Bratislava KHL 45 1 4 5 0.111 0.2777 0.2825 1.5305 1.5570
2019-20 Växjö Lakers HC SHL 28 7 4 11 0.393 0.9823 0.9823 5.1236 5.1236
2020-21 Iserlohn Roosters DEL 37 20 24 44 1.189 2.9730 2.9730 10.0800 10.0800
2021-22 Iserlohn Roosters DEL 50 23 18 41 0.820 2.0500 1.8591 6.9506 6.3033
2022-23 Iserlohn Roosters DEL 53 12 27 39 0.736 1.8395 1.6140 6.2369 5.4725
2023-24 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 20 4 6 10 0.500 1.2500 1.0327 4.2382 3.5014
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 37 22 18 40 1.081
2013-14 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 32 9 4 13 0.406
2012-13 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 27 14 13 27 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2012-13 · Penn State
+148.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#3018
Forward overall
#146
Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.