← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-19 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Metallurg Magnitogorsk · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Lincoln Stars USHL 55 20 35 55 1.000 0.6368 0.6813 2.9967 3.2059
2012-13 Lincoln Stars USHL 57 19 27 46 0.807 0.5139 0.5224 2.4183 2.4585
2023-24 Metallurg Magnitogorsk KHL 64 12 10 22 0.344
2024-25 Metallurg Magnitogorsk KHL 64 12 14 26 0.406
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Robert Morris D1 AHA 39 2 11 13 0.333
2020-21 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 17 0 1 1 0.059
2019-20 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 33 3 3 6 0.182
2015-16 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 43 11 10 21 0.488
2014-15 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 42 11 13 24 0.571
2013-14 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 42 8 13 21 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.55
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2013-14 · North Dakota
-8.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1737
Forward overall
#65
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.