IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-19 Country: USA
2013 · Round 5, Pick #134  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Signed Professionally
Metallurg Magnitogorsk · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Lincoln Stars USHL 55 20 35 55 1.000 0.5899 0.6311 3.0034 3.2131
2012-13 Lincoln Stars USHL 57 19 27 46 0.807 0.4760 0.4839 2.4237 2.4639
2023-24 Metallurg Magnitogorsk KHL 64 12 10 22 0.344 0.8595 0.7407 4.7371 4.0822
2024-25 Metallurg Magnitogorsk KHL 64 12 14 26 0.406 1.0155 0.8451 5.5969 4.6578
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Robert Morris D1 AHA — 39 2 11 13 0.333
2020-21 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 17 0 1 1 0.059
2019-20 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 33 3 3 6 0.182
2015-16 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 43 11 10 21 0.488
2014-15 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 42 11 13 24 0.571
2013-14 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 42 8 13 21 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2013-14 · North Dakota
-1.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2124
Forward overall
#124
Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.