IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robbie Baillargeon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Indiana Ice USHL 54 14 34 48 0.889 0.5464 0.5623 2.6189 2.6953
2012-13 — USHL 55 18 23 41 0.746 0.4583 0.4473 2.1964 2.1436
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Arizona State D1 — SR 28 9 12 21 0.750
2015-16 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 36 6 6 12 0.333
2014-15 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 30 3 13 16 0.533
2013-14 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 35 10 17 27 0.771
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2013-14 · Boston University
+82.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5614
Forward overall
#266
Forward born in 1993
#342
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Joe Gambardella
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Olson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Duane
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zeb Knutson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Gravelle
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.