IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-10-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 2 2 1 3 1.500 0.5570 0.5899 1.5882 1.6819
2013-14 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 38 2 8 10 0.263 0.0977 0.0986 0.2787 0.2812
2014-15 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 20 2 2 4 0.200 0.1274 0.1178 0.5993 0.5540
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Arizona State D1 — FR 27 3 3 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2015-16 · Arizona State
+135.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34629
Forward overall
#1434
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Grebosky
Concordia · 2013-14
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zac Sikich
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.