← New Search ↗ Social Card

Villiam Haag Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-25 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Frölunda HC U20 SHL-J20 4 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Frölunda HC U20 SHL-J20 20 1 1 2 0.100 0.0558 0.0600 0.1441 0.1548
2011-12 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 45 13 6 19 0.422 0.1625 0.1690 0.5489 0.5707
2012-13 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 41 29 17 46 1.122 0.4320 0.4271 1.4586 1.4420
2018-19 IK Pantern Allsvenskan 48 15 11 26 0.542
2019-20 Almtuna IS Allsvenskan 52 12 21 33 0.635
2020-21 Linköping HC SHL 5 1 0 1 0.200
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 35 7 8 15 0.429
2015-16 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 31 7 8 15 0.484
2014-15 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 35 5 5 10 0.286
2013-14 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 35 8 5 13 0.371
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2013-14 · Michigan State
+34.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3127
Forward overall
#136
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2001-02
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.