IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Gilmour Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-05-17 Country: Canada
2013 · Round 7, Pick #198  ·  Calgary Flames Calgary Flames
Signed Professionally
Adler Mannheim · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 58 10 14 24 0.414 0.2441 0.2448 1.2428 1.2462
2020-21 CSKA Moskva KHL 12 3 3 6 0.500 1.2500 1.2500 6.8894 6.8894
2021-22 CSKA Moskva KHL 45 1 8 9 0.200 0.5000 0.4654 2.7557 2.5651
2022-23 Dinamo Minsk KHL 52 1 8 9 0.173 0.4328 0.3682 2.3851 2.0288
2023-24 Adler Mannheim DEL 51 6 21 27 0.529 1.3235 1.1963 4.4884 4.0570
2024-25 Adler Mannheim DEL 51 8 19 27 0.529 1.3235 1.1355 4.4884 3.8508
2025-26 Adler Mannheim DEL 52 6 24 30 0.577 1.4423 1.3050 4.8911 4.4255
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 34 9 14 23 0.676
2014-15 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 30 4 7 11 0.367
2013-14 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 39 5 13 18 0.462
2012-13 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 38 4 9 13 0.342
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2012-13 · Providence
+48.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#817
Defenseman overall
#200
Defenseman born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.