IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Louis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-10 Country: USA
2013 · Round 6, Pick #181  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Signed Professionally
Augsburger Panther · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — NTDP-U18 56 27 15 42 0.750 0.5575 0.5666 2.7985 2.8443
2012-13 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 62 22 29 51 0.823 0.6114 0.5895 3.0694 2.9592
2022-23 Barys Astana KHL 57 9 21 30 0.526 1.3157 1.2333 7.2517 6.7976
2024-25 Augsburger Panther DEL 44 6 23 29 0.659 1.6478 1.5568 5.5880 5.2793
2025-26 Augsburger Panther DEL 36 14 13 27 0.750 1.8750 1.8593 6.3586 6.3053
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Miami D1 NCHC SR 36 14 25 39 1.083
2015-16 Miami D1 NCHC JR 36 11 15 26 0.722
2014-15 Miami D1 NCHC SO 37 9 27 36 0.973
2013-14 Miami D1 NCHC FR 36 12 13 25 0.694
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.54
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2013-14 · Miami
+28.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1907
Forward overall
#104
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.