IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Louis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-10 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Augsburger Panther · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — NTDP-U18 56 27 15 42 0.750 0.5966 0.6064 2.8089 2.8548
2012-13 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 62 22 29 51 0.823 0.6543 0.6308 3.0808 2.9702
2022-23 Barys Astana KHL 57 9 21 30 0.526 — — — —
2024-25 Augsburger Panther DEL 44 6 23 29 0.659 — — — —
2025-26 Augsburger Panther DEL 36 14 13 27 0.750 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Miami D1 NCHC SR 36 14 25 39 1.083
2015-16 Miami D1 NCHC JR 36 11 15 26 0.722
2014-15 Miami D1 NCHC SO 37 9 27 36 0.973
2013-14 Miami D1 NCHC FR 36 12 13 25 0.694
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.58
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2013-14 · Miami
+20.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1249
Forward overall
#42
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Vinni Lettieri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.61 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Diamantoni
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Hayden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.