IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Roos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-12-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chicago Steel USHL 25 11 11 22 0.880 0.5409 0.5844 2.5927 2.8011
2012-13 Chicago Steel USHL 64 23 24 47 0.734 0.4514 0.4637 2.1637 2.2225
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 13 3 3 6 0.462
2016-17 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 35 2 3 5 0.143
2014-15 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 35 3 3 6 0.171
2013-14 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 35 10 7 17 0.486
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.49
2013-14 · Colorado College
+1.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5748
Forward overall
#286
Forward born in 1994
#372
in USHL

D1 Comparables

C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Hayden
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.