IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eliot Grauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-11-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — NAHL 54 26 21 47 0.870 0.3198 0.3399 0.9187 0.9765
2011-12 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 49 6 14 20 0.408 0.2408 0.2355 1.2260 1.1990
2012-13 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 58 20 27 47 0.810 0.2977 0.2868 0.8553 0.8240
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 13 6 7 13 1.000
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 28 13 16 29 1.036
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 24 6 9 15 0.625
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 12 3 4 7 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+155.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15380
Forward overall
#579
Forward born in 1992
#754
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Anderson
Hamilton · 2009-10
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carson Nickulas
Endicott · 2024-25
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.