icepath.io · Hockey Analytics

← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eddie Wittchow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-10-31 Country: USA

2011 · Round 5, Pick #154 ·

Florida Panthers

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2011-12	Waterloo Black Hawks	USHL	60	5	13	18	0.300	0.1770	0.1727	0.9010	0.8790
2018-19	KooKoo	Liiga	47	9	9	18	0.383	0.9575	0.9673	3.2923	3.3259

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2015-16	Wisconsin	D1	BigTen	SR	32	0	7	7	0.219
2014-15	Wisconsin	D1	BigTen	JR	25	0	0	0	0.000
2013-14	Wisconsin	D1	BigTen	SO	37	1	6	7	0.189
2012-13	Wisconsin	D1	WCHA-orig	FR	29	0	3	3	0.103

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.16

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.10

2012-13 · Wisconsin

-36.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 22 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects

27%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

73%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#732

Defenseman overall

#189

Defenseman born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.