IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danny O'Regan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-30 Country: USA
2012 · Round 5, Pick #138  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
Signed Professionally
Schwenninger Wild Wings · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 14 4 6 10 0.714 0.5309 0.5123 2.6785 2.5845
2023-24 MoDo Hockey SHL 34 4 8 12 0.353 0.8822 0.7516 4.6020 3.9207
2024-25 Shanghai Dragons KHL 65 11 16 27 0.415 1.0385 0.8313 5.7226 4.5807
2025-26 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 41 11 19 30 0.732 1.8293 1.7197 6.2021 5.8307
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 39 17 27 44 1.128
2014-15 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 41 23 27 50 1.220
2013-14 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 35 10 12 22 0.629
2012-13 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 39 16 22 38 0.974
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2012-13 · Boston University
+104.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1962
Forward overall
#115
Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.