IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Sheehy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-20 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Straubing Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0843 0.0951 0.4292 0.4843
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1269 0.6007 0.6458
2013-14 — USHL 50 21 28 49 0.980 0.5781 0.5945 2.9433 3.0266
2014-15 — USHL 56 17 36 53 0.946 0.5583 0.5466 2.8424 2.7830
2021-22 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 49 25 18 43 0.878 2.1940 2.4357 7.4405 8.2603
2022-23 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 53 12 22 34 0.641 1.6037 1.7332 5.4388 5.8779
2023-24 Straubing Tigers DEL 50 11 14 25 0.500 1.2500 1.2868 4.2391 4.3639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 38 12 29 41 1.079
2017-18 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 36 12 13 25 0.694
2016-17 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 38 20 33 53 1.395
2015-16 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 37 12 18 30 0.811
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.53
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2015-16 · Minnesota
+53.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#3119
Forward overall
#181
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.