IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Sheehy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-20 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Straubing Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0878 0.0991 0.4210 0.4750
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1229 0.1321 0.5892 0.6334
2013-14 — USHL 50 21 28 49 0.980 0.6024 0.6194 2.8873 2.9690
2014-15 — USHL 56 17 36 53 0.946 0.5818 0.5696 2.7883 2.7300
2021-22 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 49 25 18 43 0.878 0.9597 1.0654 — —
2022-23 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 53 12 22 34 0.641 0.7015 0.7581 — —
2023-24 Straubing Tigers DEL 50 11 14 25 0.500 0.5468 0.5629 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 38 12 29 41 1.079
2017-18 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 36 12 13 25 0.694
2016-17 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 38 20 33 53 1.395
2015-16 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 37 12 18 30 0.811
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.55
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2015-16 · Minnesota
+47.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3048
Forward overall
#178
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Geordan Buffoline
New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.