IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Wilkie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-10 Country: USA
2015 · Round 6, Pick #162  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
Signed Professionally
Löwen Frankfurt · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Lincoln Stars USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 56 13 18 31 0.554 0.4115 0.4258 2.0657 2.1375
2013-14 Tri-City Storm USHL 57 17 19 36 0.632 0.3726 0.3950 1.8969 2.0110
2014-15 Tri-City Storm USHL 59 35 20 55 0.932 0.5499 0.5560 2.7998 2.8306
2022-23 Bietigheim Steelers DEL 44 16 11 27 0.614 1.5340 1.7068 5.2022 5.7882
2023-24 Grizzlys Wolfsburg DEL 50 21 12 33 0.660 1.6500 1.7512 5.5956 5.9389
2024-25 Shanghai Dragons KHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.4167 0.3844 2.2969 2.1190
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 34 23 8 31 0.912
2018-19 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 20 6 13 19 0.950
2016-17 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 30 1 9 10 0.333
2015-16 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 32 5 4 9 0.281
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2015-16 · North Dakota
-33.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2107
Forward overall
#118
Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Gravelle
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.