IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Berger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-14 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Bietigheim Steelers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Tri-City Storm USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Tri-City Storm USHL 57 14 15 29 0.509 0.3001 0.2933 1.5281 1.4937
2014-15 Tri-City Storm USHL 58 10 20 30 0.517 0.3051 0.2832 1.5534 1.4420
2022-23 Bietigheim Steelers DEL 51 8 25 33 0.647 1.6178 1.6662 5.4862 5.6504
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 39 14 15 29 0.744
2017-18 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 38 11 16 27 0.711
2016-17 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 39 13 23 36 0.923
2015-16 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 38 13 13 26 0.684
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2015-16 · Penn State
+178.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#5935
Forward overall
#292
Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.