Peter Quenneville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-09 Country: Canada

2013 · Round 7, Pick #195 ·

Columbus Blue Jackets

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2010-11	Sherwood Park Crusaders	AJHL	54	6	16	22	0.407	0.1366	0.1525	0.3770	0.4210
2011-12	Sherwood Park Crusaders	AJHL	53	31	50	81	1.528	0.5126	0.5464	1.4143	1.5076
2012-13	Dubuque Fighting Saints	USHL	63	33	37	70	1.111	0.6554	0.6489	3.3371	3.3039
2013-14	Brandon Wheat Kings	WHL	44	21	30	51	1.159	0.5639	0.5306	2.8441	2.6760
2014-15	Brandon Wheat Kings	WHL	72	27	48	75	1.042	0.5068	0.4521	2.5560	2.2801
2017-18	SaiPa	Liiga	9	3	1	4	0.444	1.1110	1.2390	3.8201	4.2601
2021-22	Lausitzer Füchse	DEL2	52	32	48	80	1.538	2.0610	2.1313	2.7607	2.8549
2024-25	Kiekko-Espoo	Liiga	51	19	16	35	0.686	1.7158	1.3644	5.8995	4.6914

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2013-14	Quinnipiac	D1	ECAC	FR	5	0	4	4	0.800

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.57

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.80

2013-14 · Quinnipiac

+41.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1188

Forward overall

#68

Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.